3 ms·
That's terrific, and apologies if you feel I've slighted Rust at all. (I admire Rust's goals to deliver safety without compromising performance or debuggability
by bcantrill 11y ago
That's terrific, and apologies if you feel I've slighted Rust at all. (I admire Rust's goals to deliver safety without compromising performance or debuggability.) From a native perspective, two things I would love to see with respect to Rust: first, a comment on Alex Light's work[1], as alternative allocators like libumem are often essential for debuggability. Second, I would love to see the applicability of native techniques like postmortem object type identification[2] to Rust. If that "just works" it would be reason alone to seriously evaluate Rust!
[1] http://scialex.github.io/reenix.pdf http://scialex.github.io/reenix.pdf
[2] http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0309037v1.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0309037v1.pdf
- pcwalton 11y agoNo worries, and apologies if I seemed snippy. Thanks for the fascinating link on postmortem object type identification; now I have some reading to do :)