1) A nexus with a civil fraud case. 2) That is fundamental due dilligence for any fiduciary appointment. 3) A criminal conviction is un-neccessary to prove ci

1) A nexus with a civil fraud case. 2) That is fundamental due dilligence for any fiduciary appointment. 3) A criminal conviction is un-neccessary to prove civil fraud in relation to (1,2). (Those are legitimate issues/topics of dicsussion).