4 ms·
As long as Apple hasn't officially agreed to this, and you seem to have some sort of embargo on even referring to them by name, something other than full buy-in
by SiVal 11y ago
As long as Apple hasn't officially agreed to this, and you seem to have some sort of embargo on even referring to them by name, something other than full buy-in from them is still a possibility. This possibility makes me nervous, because I think wasm is just what the Web needs, and I don't necessarily trust Apple to have "whatever is best for the open Web" as a guiding principle.
As for "getting my mad on," you seem to have gone off on some sort of tirade at the end there implying--how ironic--that I actually wanted TRULY SHINY COMPANY to save us from wasm, and your caps-lock key seems to have gotten stuck when you banged on it.
- BrendanEich 11y agoPlease accept my apologies for the ALLCAPs. You were nervous in a way that suggested to me the kind of fannish knee-jerking that I unfairly lampooned. I hope you can relax. All will be clear pretty soon, I am certain. There's no need to be nervous. Well, no need to be more nervous than usual! ;-)
- SiVal 11y agoAll is well between us, and I can't thank you enough for what you're trying to do. Here I thought ES6 was the best news of the year for Web dev, but wasm will beat it by far--as long as the long-term cooperation you (correctly) said it needs really comes through. It's hard to relax when we're soooo close to something this tantalizing, all but one have officially committed, but it has to be unanimous, and that one is not...yet...saying.... I'll watch these pages and let out a woot! the minute Apple officially makes it unanimous.