4 ms·
What would you use instead? Spring MVC covers a lot use cases simultaneously. I use Wicket but it doesn't cover all the use cases that Spring MVC does.
by eip 11y ago
What would you use instead? Spring MVC covers a lot use cases simultaneously.
I use Wicket but it doesn't cover all the use cases that Spring MVC does.
- yowza 11y agoThere it goes. Trying to cover a lot of use cases.
- unclebucknasty 11y ago>What would you use instead? Maybe Assembler with a little Perl? Anything else! Seriously, even the old Struts was better. >I use Wicket Wicket is pretty elegant. Clean, componentized, and fosters reuse. Issues with heavy session-reliance probably keep it from being more general-purpose, but it's actually fun to use.