4 ms·

No, it's: "No Uber/Lyft, no drivers"

• kohanz 11y ago
  Sure, but I'm not sure what conclusion that helps us draw in regards to a contractor/employee distinction. The former is saying a business cannot exist without employees performing critical functions (I'm not saying that this is de facto truth, but just phrasing the argument). The latter is saying that without a business, you don't have employees/contractors, which makes sense, but seems obvious and inconsequential.
  • mfoy_ 11y ago
    I think it's more like "You can't have one without the other, therefore they aren't just contractors". A ride-sharer / driver needs the platform and the platform needs the driver, fundamentally. It's not like most contracting where it's not the end of the world if all the contracts end.