10 ms·

This thing is really blown out of porportion now: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1929071_1929070,00.html http://www.time.com/time/sp

• presidentender 17y ago
  It's literally FUD (UD?), in that the skeptics are spreading uncertainty and doubt about the legitimacy of the models and the underlying data that the world leadership has accepted as gospel truth for the past decade. But it might be good FUD, because it might reopen intelligent discussion on a topic where debate has consisted of name-calling for just as long.
  • gloob 17y ago
    But it might be good FUD, because it might reopen intelligent discussion on a topic where debate has consisted of name-calling for just as long. My suspicion is that it will renew name-calling in a discussion that has consisted of name-calling for just as long, but then, I'm a cynic. Fingers crossed, though.