3 ms·
I'm not clear (or arguing the point) about how this is specific to H-1B. Companies routinely lay off older, more expensive workers to get cheaper, younger emplo
by silverbax88 11y ago
I'm not clear (or arguing the point) about how this is specific to H-1B. Companies routinely lay off older, more expensive workers to get cheaper, younger employees. It's not what companies should do, but they do it all of the time.
And then there's this, where apparently Disney cancelled the layoffs:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/us/in-turnabout-disney-cancels-tech-worker-layoffs.html?referrer=&_r=0 http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/us/in-turnabout-disney-...
Which I don't see how that's entirely possible given that the article posted by OP specifically states that many employees were already let go in January.
I can only speculate that the January layoffs were executed, and over the past week it was discovered that the 'replacement contractors' weren't the cheap magic rocket that Disney expected. That, too, happens in companies all of the time.
- jgoewert 11y agoAnyone else read the article with the nagging voice saying: "Oh crap, we got caught trying to really bend the H1B program and have irked our main customer base. We'd better say that we are undoing it then put a policy in place to more slowly drive out everyone making more than minimum wage by using bad reviews and implementing impossible goals. No one will notice if we do it slowly."
- silverbax88 11y agoI saw (or just inferred) damage control. The 'Happiest Place on Earth' can't make headlines for laying people off. I mean, they still will lay people off, but they'll spin it like they are actually creating tons of jobs and everyone is super duper happy about it.