34 ms·
Any time you want to talk about cancer, you have to acknowledge the fact that it's actually over a hundred diseases. Cancer treatment is phenomenally effective
by pwnstigator 17y ago
Any time you want to talk about cancer, you have to acknowledge the fact that it's actually over a hundred diseases. Cancer treatment is phenomenally effective for some cancers, for some classes of patients, and ineffective for others.
I can name eight people, off the top of my head, I've known who've had cancer. (I'm sure I could list more.) Three died, four are alive and well, and one was diagnosed last month. We're talking about a disease that would have killed all 8 a few decades ago.
Also, even if the improvements in cancer treatment are only interative (8 months instead of 3) that's still a major gain, from a research perspective. Look at HIV/AIDS; in 1985, it was an incurable and fatal disease. Due to a series iterative improvements, someone who contracts HIV today in the developed world will very likely be alive in 15 years, and by then, there may be a cure.
- tptacek 17y agoYou guys can have a big long emotional conversation about cancer care, but cancer isn't where all the cost is in the system, and cancer treatment may not even be where all the cost is in cancer care (tests, many of which have been demonstrated to be ineffective, may be the major component instead).