I'm not "crazy", not at all. Math is supposed to be useful. There's a long track record that it can be. I studied math hoping it would be useful, and I believe

I'm not "crazy", not at all. Math is supposed to be useful. There's a long track record that it can be. I studied math hoping it would be useful, and I believe that it is for my project. Doing some applied math might seem unusual, but it's not "crazy". The unusual part indicates an opportunity. A "name"? For my work so far, I've not needed a static IP address so have not paid extra for one from my ISP. So neither do I have a domain name yet. I won't get a static IP address or a domain name until just before I go live, ASAP. My startup is for Internet search, discovery, recommendation, curation, notification, and subscription for safe for work Internet content where keywords/phrases work at best poorly. My project might become a big thing. The user interface is just a simple HTTP, HTML, CSS Web site, also simple enough for smart phones. So, my software takes in data, manipulates it, and sends the user the results. The crucial core of the manipulations is from some math I derived based on some advanced prerequisites I got mostly in grad school. Right, the users will see the results but not be aware of any of the math. What the user does with the Web site and the results they get back will seem intuitively reasonable and maybe even natural, but actually doing the data manipulations in a way with good promise of good results is a challenge, one that I addressed mathematically. The theorems give good evidence that with some good data the results for the users will be good. Given what I'm betting on this project, I want the good evidence, up front, long before TIFO results, traction, etc. My main use of italics is a common one, mark a word as being used in a sense maybe not the same as in a literal dictionary definition and, thus, needing some caution, reinterpretation, and/or apology.