2 ms·
SNI has been a thing for a long while now.. Do you seriously need to support older browsers than this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Web_
by adisbladis 11y ago
SNI has been a thing for a long while now..
Do you seriously need to support older browsers than this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Web_browsers.5B6.5D https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Web_bro...
- LinuxBender 11y agoSNI is fine for web browsing, but for end-points that need to be reachable by older versions of python, tomcat, ruby and many proprietary apps, this will not suffice. This becomes a problem on business to business communications, automation, API's, etc. For the general purpose websites, blogs, etc, SNI would be fine.
- hobarrera 11y agoYou're probably talking about really old versions of applications. I've been using SNI for half a decade without any issues. Anything so old that does not support SNI probably still uses SSLv3, or maybe even SSLv2, so you really should be upgrading that ASAP, rather than keep supporting it.
- LinuxBender 11y agoIf you take a look at the wiki article, there are some versions listed. Those are still in use. If our company forced people to use SNI, we would be out of business. There are TLS 1.0+ enabled apps that can't do SNI. Perhaps you and I are just in very different business models.