6 ms·
New Relic Boxes – Monitor your servers and applications
- prohor 11y agoTake a look on https://ruxit.com https://ruxit.com - the problem concept that it introduce might be what you look for. It is a correlation of events or alerts in whole system that one causes another and it tells the root cause. There is a problem dashboard and you can get notifications when a problem occurs.
- no1youknowz 11y agoRuxit is horribly expensive. I have 10 servers and something like OpsDash or New Relic is much more cheaper!
- jon-wood 11y agoWow, anything that can be compared to New Relic and come out cheaper really must cost a fortune. New Relic are great, but at the moment they're probably the most expensive part of our infrastructure (including servers, through virtue of AWS giving hefty account credits to companies in incubators).
- nasalgoat 11y agoThe secret to NewRelic is to deploy it on a limited number of servers to monitor performance and use an open source monitoring tool like Icinga to do actual monitoring.
- solutionyogi 11y agoRuxit looked very interesting. But you are right, they are expensive. 0.15$ per host per hour. That means, 0.15 x 24 x 30 = 108$ per month per host. Compare it to something like Data Dog which costs 15$ per host per month. https://www.datadoghq.com/pricing/ https://www.datadoghq.com/pricing/
- xpadash 11y agoLet them use boxes, I'm staying with hexagons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRg5kGSHzVY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRg5kGSHzVY
- solutionyogi 11y agoI agree that it is expensive. However, I went through their Product Tour and blogs and it looks like they are taking a very novel approach as far as APM is concerned. Apart from the price, how's the actual experience? Does their AI actually identify the root cause of a problem? Does the no-configuration approach actually work?
- AloisReitbauer 11y agoRuxit is actually cheaper than New Relic by about 149 if you use it 24x7 and commit to an annual contract. Ruxit is pure pay-as-you go. Why do you think this is more expensive?
- AloisReitbauer 11y agoRuxit is actually cheaper than New Relic by about 40 USD if you use it 24x7 and commit to an annual contract. Ruxit is pure pay-as-you go. Why do you think this is more expensive?
- gedrap 11y agoIf I understood correctly, ruxit is a monitoring service (so basically new relic replacement with better UI), while the OP's product is just a New Relic API client. So these are quite different products :)
- AloisReitbauer 11y agoYou can for sure replace New Relic with Ruxit and it also comes with quite some benefits regarding smarter alerting and problem analysis.
- danielbentov 11y agoRuxit looks great. But ours is free and opened source.
- thecodemonkey 11y agoExcept that it requires New Relic which is not exactly free and open source :)
- danielbentov 11y ago:)
- pc86 11y agoYou are correct, but if you happen to have an MSDN license that gives you access to Azure, it is! We use New Relic for test and production monitoring and it's great.
- katzboaz 11y agoLove it! Tnx!
- rafaqueque 11y agoUseful. There are some things that can be improved, like a nice padding around the boxes, which looks weird right now. PS: Barcelona fan/supporter?
- joeyrobert 11y agoThat alarm sound is awful and it's not clear why it's playing. Edit: Linking to NewRelic by clicking on the boxes would be useful. Also perhaps a config file/server instead of using local storage to save credentials (so I can send the URL to colleagues).
- nacs 11y agoThe alarm sound for those curious: http://info.ahs.kitasato-u.ac.jp/tkweb/alarm/NPB-290-high.wav http://info.ahs.kitasato-u.ac.jp/tkweb/alarm/NPB-290-high.wa... Strange that it's linking to a remote website (a university in Japan no less) just for the sound instead of using a locally hosted copy.