5 ms·
>but I hold that being overweight and exercising How is being overweight 'far better' for health or well being? (assuming you're talking about excess adipose t
by dylanjermiah 11y ago
>but I hold that being overweight and exercising
How is being overweight 'far better' for health or well being? (assuming you're talking about excess adipose tissue).
Please define 'function' and how excess adipose increases ones ability to walk, run and climb.
- kfk 11y agoI have seen plenty of overweight people back in Italy that were able to do tough 10 hrs hikes or caving explorations with heavy loads or else. They looked far more healthy to me than slim people that do no exercise. I am just very skeptic of using weight as a measure of health or even as a universal goal. That said, being very overweight is a problem and being slim and doing exercise is a better option.
- dylanjermiah 11y ago>I have seen plenty of overweight people back in Italy that were able to do tough 10 hrs hikes or caving explorations with heavy loads or else. They looked far more healthy to me than slim people that do no exercise. What do you define as 'overweight'? How did they 'look far more healthy' than slim people? >I am just very skeptic of using weight as a measure of health or even as a universal goal. That said, being very overweight is a problem and being slim and doing exercise is a better option. It's not weight per se it's excess adipose tissue. Any where past 20% for males and 30% BF for females will generally decrease performance to a significant extent.