3 ms·
It doesn't require that replaceable components are always replaced with non-replaceable ones. The point is that over time, a replaceable component is likely to
by rcthompson 11y ago
It doesn't require that replaceable components are always replaced with non-replaceable ones. The point is that over time, a replaceable component is likely to be swapped out multiple times, until, probably by accident, it is replaced with a component that is no easily replaceable, as which point it becomes stuck (e.g. glue code is written specifically to interface with that component and would be difficult to rewrite for a replacement).
In mathematical terms, you can imagine it as a Markov chain describing the component currently slotted in, where non-replaceable components are the absorbing states.
- geon 11y agoIf the easly replacable component is good, there will be no reason to replace it at all. Components aren't getting replaced willy-nilly.
- rcthompson 11y agoYes, but easily-replaceable components are still going to be replaced more often than difficult-to-replace ones.
- geon 11y agoZero * n is still zero.