5 ms·
The religious and reverent tone of this article gives away the true purpose for this initiative. Power. Make no mistake, those pushing this project are Machiav
by pdeuchler 11y ago
The religious and reverent tone of this article gives away the true purpose for this initiative. Power.
Make no mistake, those pushing this project are Machiavellians of the highest order. They did not spend their entire lives playing the political game and manipulating their way to the top in order to "do good" and "change government". If they truly wanted to "do good" they could very easily accomplish huge strides with a single stroke of a pen, yet this fails to happen day in and day out. Furthermore the very idea that those who control the machinations of government would want to change that system is ludicrous on face, and requires significant cognitive dissonance to believe. This is about leverage.
Before the Snowden revelations the government had most of the tech companies comfortably in their pocket with no real downside to those companies. Those revelations have forced companies to choose between consumers and the government, a choice that seems to be slightly leaning towards consumers recently (rollouts of security features, encryption by default). Regardless of the vast abilities of the NSA, they still rely on Silicon Valley for an absurd percentage of their intelligence gathering.
This scares the Washington elite (please note this elite is not constrained by political party), and so they go after the cornerstone of Silicon Valley's own power base. Talent. This is a warning shot, a demonstration that a 45 minute meeting with the president is sufficient to fully co-opt some of the best and brightest SV has to offer.
Let's be real here. If the President really cared about the VA he wouldn't have waited until he was a lame duck to spearhead some website when the reality is the VA is woefully underfunded and highly dysfunctional as an organization from structure to implementation. No javascript front end will change those things. This lip service to building better systems to "help people" is a poor mask over the fact that they would control the people who designed and built that very system, and thus, control the system. He who has the power to destroy has the ultimate power.
Everyone on this website knows Google is one of the most powerful companies on earth because of their talent. Everyone knows that startups die when the lead engineer gets poached. You don't take talent from Google to not compete with them... this is just war games on a much more abstracted level.
- ethanbond 11y agoCould you give an example of how the President could "very easily accomplish huge strides with a single stroke of a pen?" The government is specifically designed against what you are stating is/should be the norm. This is literally the antithesis of the American government's mandate and design.
- mkempe 11y agoAbolish the surveillance state, for one.
- ethanbond 11y agoCan you outline more specifically what that means? Just dismiss and lay off the NSA? What about the CIA? How about the DIA? What prevents DEA/ATF from taking up the reins? What about the FBI? Welcome to government, the only ecosystem designed to kill productivity for fear of tyranny.
- mkempe 11y agoYou could, if you wanted to. He and his consiglieri could too, if he wanted to. The obstacle is not the means, it is the end. He likes the Surveillance State.
- pdeuchler 11y agoThe President managed to authorize a taskforce of 500 software engineers without much fuss, I don't see your point here. But even assuming your premise, First Ladies are very often tasked with lip service public good projects, it probably wouldn't hurt to add some Presidential oomph to the existing forays. That seems like very easy low hanging fruit.
- ethanbond 11y agoA power that's delegated to him by the Constitution. There are very specific guidelines surrounding what a President (or any other member of government) can and cannot do. You're saying the President should spend more time putting his name behind social initiatives? Something tells me you'd be unimpressed. Not that he shouldn't do it, but, as you said, he's assembled a 500-person strong startup to rebuild gov't infrastructure and numerous people here find it futile.
- crdb 11y agoLooking at the top comment though, it does not look like these 500 software engineers have much power. If they had, they could effect real change. Finding budget for 500 programmers is a drop in the ocean of the current Federal budget. They probably could get a few of the drivers moving parts around for the JSF program to drive a little slower for a couple of days and use the fuel savings.
- mkempe 11y agoIndeed. Those who choose to devote their life and passion to Leviathan are willing agents of Leviathan. The problem with the Modern State is not a lack of efficiency but a lack of limits.