3 ms·
Re:whiggish-ness https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/september-2012/two-cheers-for-the-whig-interpretation-of-histo
by bgilroy26 11y ago
Re:whiggish-ness
https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/september-2012/two-cheers-for-the-whig-interpretation-of-history https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/pers...
- DubiousPusher 11y agoThanks for posting this. That essay is fantastic. It's actually a perfect complement to that article and the discussion happening in this entire thread. It beautifully highlights the modern historian's crisis. You cannot distill history into a framework because any unique set of events seem to be reproduced somewhere else in history with different outcomes. You must distill history into a framework otherwise it's impossible to reason about and understand.
- benbreen 11y agoThis seems like a good spot to link to one of my favorite essays on the theme you've raised here - the historian and philosopher Isaiah Berlin (of the hedgehog and the fox fame) on "The Concept of Scientific History." (Short version: he argues that there's no such thing). By the way, I'm happy to see such an interesting discussion of my favorite historical topic on HN - thanks. http://berlin.wolf.ox.ac.uk/published_works/cc/scihist.pdf http://berlin.wolf.ox.ac.uk/published_works/cc/scihist.pdf