3 ms·
That's an interesting way to put it! And yes, I agree one would like both, optimally. Btw, Robert Aloi linked some kind of simpler back-pressure implementation
by samuell 11y ago
That's an interesting way to put it! And yes, I agree one would like both, optimally.
Btw, Robert Aloi linked some kind of simpler back-pressure implementation available already today in Erlang, on G+:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SamuelLampa/posts/Q1XLTpk4KQC https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SamuelLampa/posts/Q1XLTpk4KQC
... though as he says, might not be sufficient for whats typically needed in flow-based, or CSP-style programs.
- samuell 11y agoAnd yea, I very loosely treat Go as more or less a Flow-based programming system ... especially after I realized one can write more or less FBP network semantics in vanilla, framework-less Go [1]. [1] http://blog.gopheracademy.com/composable-pipelines-pattern http://blog.gopheracademy.com/composable-pipelines-pattern :)