3 ms·
"Linux distro maintainers wanted to move on from SysV Init" LOL no. distro maintainers wanted to ship gnome, which was product tied to systemd. No systemd, n
by VLM 11y ago
"Linux distro maintainers wanted to move on from SysV Init"
LOL no. distro maintainers wanted to ship gnome, which was product tied to systemd. No systemd, no gnome, that simple.
- EmanueleAina 11y agoAre you seriously saying that most distribution maintainers were happy with sysvinit? For what is worth, all the Debian maintainers I know, even those who are not systemd supporters, felt that sysvinit had to go in a way or the other (eg. during the default init debate the options were systemd and Upstart, sysvint was doomed to be replaced and only kept as a compatibility option in any case.)
- the_why_of_y 11y agoPerhaps you could benefit from reading what some of the people making these decisions have written on the topic. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=1729;bug=727708 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=1729;bug=7... https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1149530#p1149530 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1149530#p1149530