5) I've replied on another comment, but stringer was not written back then. Totally agree on that one :) 6) Makes sense, but starting it with +1 makes it reall

5) I've replied on another comment, but stringer was not written back then. Totally agree on that one :) 6) Makes sense, but starting it with +1 makes it really easy to see if it's initialized or not (if you care about or need the knowledge of external explicit initialization). 11) Thanks akavel :)