3 ms·

What the fuck are you even talking about. You make no sense. And people are allowed to cricise people who are in very public places in obvious positions of powe

by arrrg 11y ago

What the fuck are you even talking about. You make no sense. And people are allowed to cricise people who are in very public places in obvious positions of power and who also act as role models. That comes with the job, you know. Sometimes you might have to face criticism and sometimes that criticism might be a bit unfair or harsh. Oh my god, the horror. What an unbelievable thing. (I think that’s something you have to allow groups of people who were oppressed and specifically excluded from science for centuries, you know.) He dealt with it and that’s that. I’m astonished how suddenly people want to treat someone like a raw egg while simultaneously decrying people who voice their criticism (and it’s mostly criticism, no offense!) as too delicate or always taking offense. It’s so weird (probably because it’s an argument made completely in bad faith, just to complain about bad feminists or some similar misogynist bullshit link voting websites are so good at spewing).

hoopd 11y ago
> I think that’s something you have to allow groups of people who were oppressed and specifically excluded from science for centuries, you know. I disagree with this on so many levels. He wasn't attacked by women, in your argument only women have "earned" the right to be abusive to him because it's somehow reasonable to punish him for things done by men who are no longer around? Either way, he was attacked by the social justice movement and last I checked there has not been a concerted effort to exclude them from science. In general, you get special concessions to fight back against people who have oppressed you directly, by the time you start attacking a group's grandchildren for what they did to your grandparents you're just being a jerk. > just to complain about bad feminists or some similar misogynist bullshit Have I oppressed you? Have I excluded you? This is not an appropriate way to talk to somebody who simply disagrees with you.

by arrrg 11y ago

hoopd 11y ago

> I think that’s something you have to allow groups of people who were oppressed and specifically excluded from science for centuries, you know. I disagree with this on so many levels. He wasn't attacked by women, in your argument only women have "earned" the right to be abusive to him because it's somehow reasonable to punish him for things done by men who are no longer around? Either way, he was attacked by the social justice movement and last I checked there has not been a concerted effort to exclude them from science. In general, you get special concessions to fight back against people who have oppressed you directly, by the time you start attacking a group's grandchildren for what they did to your grandparents you're just being a jerk. > just to complain about bad feminists or some similar misogynist bullshit Have I oppressed you? Have I excluded you? This is not an appropriate way to talk to somebody who simply disagrees with you.