2 ms·
MS extended the protocol, not the implementation. How would the Oracle lawsuit change anything? Protocols are almost explicitly the things that are not protect
by throwawaykf05 11y ago
MS extended the protocol, not the implementation.
How would the Oracle lawsuit change anything? Protocols are almost explicitly the things that are not protected by copyright. The problem is, people here are confusing interfaces in human-readable code (copyright-eligible) with interfaces for binary interoperability between systems (not eligible).
- anonbanker 11y agono dude, not only did they take the code and extend the protocol[1], while attempting to relicense it[2], but then they tried to sue /. to remove posts of people that talked about it[3]. 1. http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Microsoft-und-Open-Source-Nichts-als-aerger-18954.html http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Microsoft-und-Open-So... 2. http://slashdot.org/story/00/05/02/158204/kerberos-pacs-and-microsofts-dirty-tricks http://slashdot.org/story/00/05/02/158204/kerberos-pacs-and-... 3. http://features.slashdot.org/story/00/05/18/2015251/our-attorneys-response-to-microsoft http://features.slashdot.org/story/00/05/18/2015251/our-atto...