4 ms·
I've built commercial designs using that approach no problems at all. Most of my crap is built on PCB blanks and I have to spend some time reverse engineering
by wumbernang 11y ago
I've built commercial designs using that approach no problems at all. Most of my crap is built on PCB blanks and I have to spend some time reverse engineering it after I'm done.
Picture straight off my bench: http://i.imgur.com/AyXNHfX.jpg http://i.imgur.com/AyXNHfX.jpg
- therealidiot 11y agoGood lord
- wumbernang 11y agoGoogle "jim Williams bench". I'm nothing :)
- CamperBob2 11y agoI don't follow you. Dead-bug construction over bare copper lies at the very opposite end of the spectrum from solderless breadboarding. The two techniques have nothing in common. You can use the dead-bug technique at frequencies well beyond 1 GHz with a bit of practice. The solderless breadboard, not so much.
- wumbernang 11y agoI'm not talking about construction here; design approach. I don't have any schematics for what I'm working on; they get drawn up later when it's all working. I have to reverse engineer deadbug and Manhattan stuff which is a downside which is my point.
- CamperBob2 11y agoAh, gotcha. Same here.