4 ms·
I don't care about privacy in general. I do care about asymmetry of privacy. Although it would be a radically different world to the one we currently live in, I
by abstractbill 17y ago
I don't care about privacy in general. I do care about asymmetry of privacy. Although it would be a radically different world to the one we currently live in, I think I would actually be quite ok with the idea of everyone having access to the GPS data, all the time.
- inerte 17y agoTo know with who your political enemy is meeting? CEOs considering a merge (on a prominent law firm)? Police officers off-duty? People on the witness protection program?
- yellowbkpk 17y agoWhere all the criminals are?
- redcap 17y agoSo you can know that the family down the street is on holidays (in Wallyworld!) and you can now rob their house?
- sailormoon 17y agoSure. Since if privacy wasn't asymmetric, they could just look up who had robbed their house by checking whose GPS appeared there while they were away.
- redcap 17y agoAnd they appeared because they have been tagged with some RFID device they haven't been smart enough either to not have it put in in the first place or to have it removed by a doctor? I don't know about you, but I don't think anyone in their right mind (apart from Mexican politicians) would really want to have tatooes on their arms/embedded RFID devices in them. And if smart crooks knew they were being tracked by their mobile phones you think they would be smart enough not to bring them to a place they decide to rob.
- pwmanagerdied 17y agoYou explain how the situation is asymmetrical, which would mean the grandparent wouldn't be happy with it. There's no conflict here; I think we understand the impracticality of the suggestion.
- cf 17y agoBut wouldn't they also know when someone that didn't know was in the house?
- FreeRadical 17y agoonly if they monitored it from their holiday location
- cma 17y agoSci-fi short story on this topic: http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm
- wallflower 17y ago+1 because Manna has a nice message about what could happen in a utopia: "Live Your Life means that you are able get the most out of your life, as opposed to the least. Instead of dying in Terrafoam, or dying in some job that you hate, you live your life in the Australia Project in freedom and prosperity. Live Your Life means that you are in control -- again, the emphasis on freedom of choice. You decide what you want to do, and then you are able to do it. You reach your full potential. Live Your Life is the idea of thinking about your life as a whole, as something that you get to design and control. Does that make sense?"