Those with the resources will always have more to lose than those without. This doesn't justify greater protections for them, especially when the reasons that h

Those with the resources will always have more to lose than those without. This doesn't justify greater protections for them, especially when the reasons that have more are directly tied to the kinds of protections they have. That's circular reasoning. What you have to show is that those who are investing more money are making better decisions. Because we want to protect those who make the best decisions, not simply those who have the most invested.