> If they don't this isn't science. It's marketing. Reporting observations doesn't make them unscientific. Science doesn't leap from nothing to perfectly tease

> If they don't this isn't science. It's marketing. Reporting observations doesn't make them unscientific. Science doesn't leap from nothing to perfectly teased-out causality. Incomplete results are still useful, as they attract attention to possibilities that require further explanation. Put another way: science isn't a waterfall project.