>The decision-making apparatus whether democratic or dictatorial of nation-states is similar to the brain of a player. See my third point. Nation A is able to

>The decision-making apparatus whether democratic or dictatorial of nation-states is similar to the brain of a player. See my third point. Nation A is able to bribe government(decision-making apparatus) of Nation B to implement such measures that will reduce competitive advantage of Nation B. This scenario is possible, happened multiple times throughout the history and undermines the "brain" model. Also this scenario violates assumed rationality of players in game theory. Do you agree?