>The primary contribution of agriculture is feeding people, not GDP. Feeding people can be done in many areas. Why should one area sacrifice a limited resourc

>The primary contribution of agriculture is feeding people, not GDP. Feeding people can be done in many areas. Why should one area sacrifice a limited resource when another area can do the same but with more of that resource? If they aren't compensated for the sacrifice of that resource, there is no reason for that resource to be sacrificed. Charity to big business will lead to being left destitute.