3 ms·
Don't get me wrong. I'm a big fan of lisp family and learning racket myself these days. I'm just saying that a statement along the lines of 'lisp is an artific
by fizixer 11y ago
Don't get me wrong. I'm a big fan of lisp family and learning racket myself these days.
I'm just saying that a statement along the lines of 'lisp is an artificial intelligence language' is really not valid anymore. You could do metaprogramming, metalinguistics, etc, all you want, and have top-notch productivity as a human programmer, but as it stands, these features have not panned out in the realization of an electronic intelligence.
Massivel parallel statistical (or stochastic, pick your favorite term) systems, despite all their limitations (at the moment), appear to me to be headed in the right direction, simply because they attempt to mimic the massively parallel and stochastic nature of brain circuitry. Is that the only way? not necessarily, but the problem has stumped us for so many decades, and has manifested itself to be so complex, that the uphill task of reverse engineering the computational model of the only working example seems to be "the lesser of all evils".
- lispm 11y agoNone of these 'massivel parallel statistical systems' mimic the brain in any way.