3 ms·
LtU is hardly shitty blogspam. Commenters there are mostly PL researchers and the discussion is usually highly technical and gives better context to papers.
by cpa 11y ago
LtU is hardly shitty blogspam. Commenters there are mostly PL researchers and the discussion is usually highly technical and gives better context to papers.
- JadeNB 11y agoI agree; but, unfortunately, at the moment, the discussion to which I was looking forward seems mostly to be the usual contribution from Hewitt (http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/5170#comment-86211 http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/5170#comment-86211 and, more generally, http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/user/8437/track http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/user/8437/track ), who likes to explain why every endeavour except his ActorScript is foolish and misplaced.
- gradstudent 11y agoI don't care about the reputation of the site in general. My heuristic is as follows: is this link providing any editorial context for some original source? If the answer is no, I classify the link as blogspam. This link right here is shitty blogspam. It deserves zero clicks.