5 ms·
Shouldn't this be pointing to the paper being discussed? https://www.academia.edu/11975482/Second-order_logic_explained_in_plain_English_ https://www.academia.
by fenomas 11y ago
Shouldn't this be pointing to the paper being discussed?
https://www.academia.edu/11975482/Second-order_logic_explained_in_plain_English_ https://www.academia.edu/11975482/Second-order_logic_explain...
- gradstudent 11y agoYeah. Shitty blogspam posts need to die die die.
- rndn 11y agoDunno, there are some blogs which are quite reputable and often you will find interesting comments on their site. I wouldn't paint it as black and white.
- cpa 11y agoLtU is hardly shitty blogspam. Commenters there are mostly PL researchers and the discussion is usually highly technical and gives better context to papers.
- JadeNB 11y agoI agree; but, unfortunately, at the moment, the discussion to which I was looking forward seems mostly to be the usual contribution from Hewitt (http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/5170#comment-86211 http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/5170#comment-86211 and, more generally, http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/user/8437/track http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/user/8437/track ), who likes to explain why every endeavour except his ActorScript is foolish and misplaced.
- gradstudent 11y agoI don't care about the reputation of the site in general. My heuristic is as follows: is this link providing any editorial context for some original source? If the answer is no, I classify the link as blogspam. This link right here is shitty blogspam. It deserves zero clicks.
- inetsee 11y agoIf you would like to download the paper without having to sign up to academia.edu, the abstract and a download link can be found here: "http://philpapers.org/rec/CORSL-3" http://philpapers.org/rec/CORSL-3".
- konz 11y agoYour link seems to be broken (due to a trailing %22). This one works: http://philpapers.org/rec/CORSL-3 http://philpapers.org/rec/CORSL-3
- inetsee 11y agoSorry. I've put links inside double quotes before, but this is the first time the second double quote has been tacked onto the link.
- JadeNB 11y agoThank you (to you and konz (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9705512 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9705512 ))! I've been wanting to read this, but not enough either to sign up at academia.edu or to read it through that site (I like to read in Preview or on paper). Coming from math, where the arXiv is deservedly the gold standard, I've never understood why other disciplines use these terrible aggregators.