5 ms·

The lack of women in CS is a problem because the CS field is missing out. There are a whole lot of intelligent women that could make important breakthroughs. Th

• deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]
• simonw 17y ago
  Exactly what I was going to say.
• gaius 17y ago
  Would as much code get written if the industry was more socially mainstream? Would it be less but better or just less? There's no denying that the lone geek (male or female) staying up late gets an awful lot done.
  • roc 17y ago
    Why do you assume 'socially mainstream' == 'less code'? You seem to be implying that geeks only write code because the industry isn't socially mainstream.
    • gaius 17y ago
      Simply because it means physically spending less time at the keyboard and less time with people who just want to code. Socially mainstream means leaving work at 5pm and going to the pub, that's what "normal" people do.
• mitko 17y ago
  Agreed. But not only women are repelled by the geeky atmosphere in the computer science. Many extrovert male people get bored and disgusted too. So it is not really even 50% of the people diversity who create the software. It feels more like 5-10%. I belong to that 5-10% and I think that among the others there are many who are way more creative than us.
  • bct 17y ago
    You don't even have to be an extrovert to be bored by what passes for culture in "geek" circles.
    • sketerpot 17y ago
      A few examples might make your comment's disdain less grating.
      • bct 17y ago
        I didn't mean it as an attack, after all there is no accounting for taste. Unless you like XKCD, in which case you are a bad person and you should feel bad.
      • selven 17y ago
        Mindlessly repeating internet memes for one (except in Soviet Russia, where meme repeats you). That's at least 50% of internet humor. Obscure references, as well. It's a type of humor that makes no sense unless you're immersed in the culture.
        • deleted 17y ago
          [deleted]
        • bct 17y ago
          And even when it makes sense it can be pretty damned tedious. (Of course, for the "joke" to be anything other than self-indulgent the reference can't be all that obscure, so what's the point?) The convergence of "geek culture" and "internet culture" is one of my big complaints. lolcats were funny for about 5 minutes.
• xenophanes 17y ago
  There are intelligent men who could make CS breakthroughs, but do other things. Why focus on women? That's sexist.
  • roc 17y ago
    The easy answer is: because they're missing at far higher rates than 'other intelligent men'. But the deeper answer is: because western society thought we'd already patched that one. We had a long history of actively discriminating against women. But despite creating a stigma around that sort of behavior and 'officially' banning it, gender representation in our particular corner of society hasn't changed all that much. Not even the modest amount that other sectors have seen. So the question of "where are the women" isn't only about the women, but about our seeming inability to fix society just by joining hands, singing kumbaya and declaring change. If we'd gone through the trouble of a social movement to kick an industry bias against, say, stereotypical jocks, extroverts, or guys-who-know-how-to-talk-to-girls, then I suppose people would pay more attention to why those groups are still under-represented too.
    • xenophanes 17y ago
      Women are treated differently in bad ways, but it's by their mothers mostly. Nothing to do with CS. As you point out, various personality types are underrepresented in CS. The particular ones that are highly represented are less common in women. There is a reason for that, and yes it's bad, but the personality type distribution among women in general has nothing to do with CS. PS My theory on feminism is that it said, "Men must reform." And so they reformed some. Meanwhile it did nothing to help women. Hence women are now worse than men.
      • bct 17y ago
        How much feminist material have you read? IMO your theory is very silly.
        • whimsy 17y ago
          Do you have any recommendations on feminist material to read? I have tried, but much of what I found was very silly.
• geebee 17y ago
  I agree, but there's a second half that people need to consider. CS is missing out on women, but are women missing out on CS? To paraphrase Phil Greenspun (from the "women in science" essay), we need to ask if CS "is a sufficiently good career that people should debate who is privileged enough to work at it?" CS at a reputable university is hard. Seriously, seriously hard. I have no doubt that people who can handle this can also handle the academic rigor of a bio major followed by med school, and they sure as hell can handle an econ major followed by an MBA, or sociology major followed by law school. So I'd start by asking: what are the women who are able to do CS doing instead, and would it be in their better interest to stop doing that and study CS?
  • elblanco 17y ago
    >but are women missing out on CS? This, I think is the central problem. It seems that most of the really really intelligent women I know have gone into other fields than CS because that's where their interests lie. CS simply wasn't a fulfillment of their interests not some more nefarious discrimination problem.