> Maybe Go is successful because it was made with Google's technical workflow in mind Sure, but Dart has a fully featured package manager, are you saying Dart

> Maybe Go is successful because it was made with Google's technical workflow in mind Sure, but Dart has a fully featured package manager, are you saying Dart was designed at Google without Google's technical workflow in mind? It's silly. > There are thousands of programming languages out there, More like hundreds of viable programming languages, not thousands. Anybody can code a lisp in his bedroom,doesn't mean it's production ready. > They haven't forced anyone to use it It's a childish and arrogant statement. Just like the "You don't need that in Go"TM. Opening source something was a political decision, but if you're saying Go doesn't need a community then by all means, state it clearly.