44 ms·
Generally agree, but the short-cut hair makes a great deal of sense if you don't want a suspect pulling on your scalp.
by angersock 11y ago
Generally agree, but the short-cut hair makes a great deal of sense if you don't want a suspect pulling on your scalp.
- ZanyProgrammer 11y agoYet female cops get by just fine without high and tights.
- angersock 11y agoHave you seen catfights? If they're serious about this "warrior" business, they should probably get buzzed down too. EDIT: Wow hivemind. It's for a similar reason that, in less hostile environments (say, machine shops), people with long hair put their hair back. It's like nobody's ever seen Bomb Girls before (much less any of the much more graphic images of, say, lathe accidents). I'm not suggesting that the warrior mindset is acceptable...merely that, if they are going to carry themselves that way (i.e., as jackbooted thugs), they should probably go all the way.
- josai 11y agoDO NOT STATE FACTS IN CONTRAVENTION OF RULE 1379.A
- 3pt14159 11y agoDe-escalation is more effective than the slight tactical advantage.
- Someone1234 11y agoBut de-escalation training is expensive, whereas equipment is often given almost for free from ex-military surplus or paid for from "anti-terrorism" federal funds. Police in other Western countries receive significantly longer training courses than US police do. This is an issue rarely discussed in this topic. If people want de-escalation, they need to fund the longer training regime and more importantly pay for it.
- jpreiland 11y ago>ex-military surplus maybe reallocating funds from military to de-escalation training would reduce surplus and improve police image and effectiveness. (disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about)
- Crito 11y agoHas it really come to vilifying a haircut? The haircut is not to blame for anything here, it is all the people who may happen to wear it. Short hair is pragmatic, but more importantly, it is a personal preference. Nobody should be criticized for wearing short hair. Doing that makes you no better than people who talk about "long-haired hippies" disparagingly.
- 3pt14159 11y agoIt isn't just the haircut on its own. If there wasn't a history of this: http://www.forgetthebox.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/American-Police-State-21.jpg http://www.forgetthebox.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Ameri... Like say the police looked more like this: http://cdn.caughtoffside.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Swedish-Police.png http://cdn.caughtoffside.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Swed... Then haircut wouldn't matter. But I have yet to meet an American cop that didn't have a "military approved" haircut.
- thesteamboat 11y agoOff topic, but this brought to mind an amusing anecdote about Hunter S. Thompson. When he ran for Sheriff's office of Aspen, CO, he shaved his head bald and referred to the (ex-army, Republican) incumbent he was running against as "my long-haired opponent".
- remarkEon 11y agoI see where you're going with that premise, but there's a particular character in The Wire that was one of David Simon's not-so-subtle devices to critique militarization of the police. A three-finger fade is wholly unnecessary.