It's not like there's an actual policy that Yarvin violated that I can be confident I'm on the right side of. This is the bigger issue - the chilling of all co

It's not like there's an actual policy that Yarvin violated that I can be confident I'm on the right side of. This is the bigger issue - the chilling of all controversial views and debate. It's less about "violated Rule XXIV, subsection (c) of the Code of Conduct" and more about "wrote some stuff that made us feel funny and we're worried that something awkward might happen at the meeting". Yes, the organizers have the power to rewrite the schedule for bad reasons or no reason at all. But it's important to point out what was done, and why we think it was done.