I believe this is the article (or part two of it): http://www.sitepoint.com/ruby-metaprogramming-part-ii/ http://www.sitepoint.com/ruby-metaprogramming-part-ii/

I believe this is the article (or part two of it): http://www.sitepoint.com/ruby-metaprogramming-part-ii/ http://www.sitepoint.com/ruby-metaprogramming-part-ii/ Not only does Ruby do metaprogramming poorly, but Rubyists have managed to give it a bad name by too often metaprogramming for the sake of metaprogramming, like in that article.