3 ms·
The distinction is certainly not meaningless, because they can't be used for surveillance - the footage of private cameras is only useful after the fact.
by crimsoneer 11y ago
The distinction is certainly not meaningless, because they can't be used for surveillance - the footage of private cameras is only useful after the fact.
- JupiterMoon 11y agoHow secure are private cameras? I assume that many are IP enabled these days. And I assume that they have default passwords...
- JupiterMoon 11y agoAnswer. Totally insecure. If GCHQ wanted to they could grab vast amounts of extra video feed.
- glitchdout 11y agoThey could? More like they are.
- JupiterMoon 11y agoSurely someone would notice the network traffic if they were (like the bill payers - small businesses tend to be on top of their bills).