> The automatic parallelization opportunities of HOFs don't happen in practice nearly as often as you'd expect. Sorry, but it's true. Haskell's "map" doesn't pa

> The automatic parallelization opportunities of HOFs don't happen in practice nearly as often as you'd expect. Sorry, but it's true. Haskell's "map" doesn't parallelize automatically. It's just a s/map/parMap/g away. Sometimes parallelization isn't worth it though. Are you talking about automatic parallelization as something that parallelizes anything possible or that also analyzes whether it's a good idea?