3 ms·
Of course it's not as bad in SmallTalk as it is in Java, to use those two as stand-ins for dynamic vs. static typing and I would change your comment to "The pro
by zwieback 11y ago
Of course it's not as bad in SmallTalk as it is in Java, to use those two as stand-ins for dynamic vs. static typing and I would change your comment to "The problem with combining them into classes is..."
In SmallTalk I would write code that operates on any object that can respond to some set of messages so the coupling is much looser.