3 ms·
I agree. I wanted a PiP Boy 3000[1]. Apple delivered another piece of wrist jewelry, of which there are far more compelling options in the market. I'd have cam
by wmeredith 11y ago
I agree. I wanted a PiP Boy 3000[1]. Apple delivered another piece of wrist jewelry, of which there are far more compelling options in the market.
I'd have camped out overnight for something like this: http://toddham.com/blog/iwatch-concept/ http://toddham.com/blog/iwatch-concept/
1) http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Pip-Boy_3000 http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Pip-Boy_3000
- zamalek 11y ago> I'd have camped out overnight for something like this That's technology! Exactly the type of revolution I was implying.
- roc 11y agoThe problem of "more capability" is that everyone has a smartphone in their pocket. Any interaction that lasts more than 2-3 taps, or 2 seconds, is a failure because the user would have been better served by retrieving their phone. (niche "phone not accessible" situations notwithstanding) The right answer to wearable tech is less interaction. The value has to be in the device presenting you the right 1-second functionality at the right time. (ala notification triage, Apple Pay, and the laundry list of Home Kit integration that's still TBD)