I am a scientist and I don't believe in Astrology, and I was always suggesting this interpretation to my friends who believe in it. Generally, the answer was "y

I am a scientist and I don't believe in Astrology, and I was always suggesting this interpretation to my friends who believe in it. Generally, the answer was "yeah, okay, maybe, I don't really care where it comes from, as long as it's correlated with the stars". However, they always reject the further conclusion that in modern times all these effects must have virtually disappeared. Also, they always confuse statistical correlation with individual people. If someone is 55% likely to have some trait, while other people are 50% likely to have that trait, it doesn't really mean you can make a definitive conclusion about a single person you see. It will only apply if you see 1000 people and do the average. Just my thoughts. Thanks for yours!