3 ms·
Ask HN: Pay-Per-Usage Remote Filesystem Mounted Locally in Linux?
Hi,
I've had no luck getting any of the AWS "S3 on Linux" solutions to work right on my Linux boxes- there's always some minor detail that prevents them from working right. I've had it with Googling & trying to overcome each obstacle that presents with each option, & am looking for an alternative to S3 storage on /mnt.
I see Rackspace has a solution, & I don't know anything about it since I've never used Rackspace for storage. I'm wondering what other locally-mounted remote storage options are available before I dive in & get a Rackspace account & try theirs.
I would be happy with an iSCSI or NFS based storage, which I can use natively with my virtualization platform (Proxmox). If it's something I can mount locally in a VM on /mnt- that's suitable, too. Just as long as its 'Pay-Per-Usage'.
What do HN readers know about that could help me?
Thanks in advance,
-c
- wmf 11y agoAWS now has NFS; I don't know how slow it would be over the Internet.
- nwrk 11y agoSpeak to your hosting provider about options they have. While considering Cloud based storage don't forget about bandwidth cost / latency. Depend on your application workload. Maybe, SSHFS can do the trick for you. https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-use-sshfs-to-mount-remote-file-systems-over-ssh https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-use-... ..depend on your use cases 2cents