My perception of Qt may be based on outdated information, but not my perception of C++. It has too many features, a too high probability of two C++ programmers

My perception of Qt may be based on outdated information, but not my perception of C++. It has too many features, a too high probability of two C++ programmers having chosen a different subset of the language to work with and thus barely understand each other's code. What I liked about Qt was exactly how it used nothing from C++ but the core language, adding a Java-like API on top. Non-standard was a good thing.