4 ms·
a digital button might just be a trigger for some force inside our minds Yup. Proof of that right here: https://www.reddit.com/r/thebutton/ https://www.reddit
by degenerate 11y ago
a digital button might just be a trigger for some force inside our minds
Yup. Proof of that right here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/thebutton/ https://www.reddit.com/r/thebutton/
Oh, wait, the experiment ended? The button finally hit 0!
http://www.redditblog.com/2015/06/the-button-has-ended.html http://www.redditblog.com/2015/06/the-button-has-ended.html
The game is over? Everyone will go back to their lives? Not quite.....
https://www.reddit.com/r/buttonaftermath https://www.reddit.com/r/buttonaftermath
- stavros 11y agoIt hit zero multiple times, and they just kept resetting it. I think it just ended with them taking it down.
- degenerate 11y agoI was under the impression that each reset was in some way due to network issues, either reddit being down briefly or a valid press not resetting the timer. Either way, it's gone long enough. I am both surprised and not surprised there is a necro sub to keep it going.
- StavrosK 11y agoI think that's what the admins claimed, but there was some disbelief, and external monitoring websites were showing the button as being at 0 for a few seconds each time. If it were an actual problem, I think it would remain at 0 until it got noticed, not just for a few seconds. Noticed that the post never says anything like "it finally reached zero", it just mentions who the last presser was.
- ipsum2 11y agoIt was a mix of the Cassandra servers serving the button being down and the buffer mentioned previously.
- icefox 11y agoFor what it was worth I saw one of the times it went down. The monitor started beeping so I went to the tab and watched it count down to zero. Hitting refresh presented me with the "reddit is down" logo and nothing on reddit worked so I believe them when they say everything simply went down. Just think about it, it was an april 1st gag, it wasn't suppose to have this type of uptime.
- StavrosK 11y agoAh, then I stand corrected.
- DSMan195276 11y agoThat's not entirely correct. What actually happened was that the button itself had a buffer which accounted for the possibility of people pressing the button, but the press registering 'late'. The buffer was 2 seconds I believe, and because of that even when the button hit zero, you could still press it for two seconds until it actually ends. So, it did hit zero more then once, but the click-buffer never expired until the time it actually ended - All the times before that, an account clicked the button before the click-buffer expired.
- StavrosK 11y agoAh, that makes sense, thank you.