3 ms·
Just no. Their hesitancy to not break backwards compatibility is why Java got so stale. They have gotten better since 1.5 but I would prefer if they broke it mo
by flurdy 11y ago
Just no.
Their hesitancy to not break backwards compatibility is why Java got so stale. They have gotten better since 1.5 but I would prefer if they broke it more often.
JVM however is a different matter.
- reagency 11y agoYou are talking about Sun really. But Java got really stale when Oracle bought Sun and no one cared about Java language for a few years. That's why 7 was so late and had almost no features. Everything in 8 was supposed to be in 7.