3 ms·
You're not far at all, you're exactly being an ideologist. If you look at Apple's practices you can't find a single one that google doesn't emulate. BTW, the
by MCRed 11y ago
You're not far at all, you're exactly being an ideologist.
If you look at Apple's practices you can't find a single one that google doesn't emulate.
BTW, the restrictions on the App Store? They are there on the Play store as well.
The ability to develop Apps and run them on any device outside the store-- Has been on the iPhone since day one. Back when google was making blackberry clones you could release iPhone apps on the web (built using a Javascript/HTML/CSS platform, that web developers claim is the best anyway with hooks into the iOS API and phone capabilities).... but people hated it.
People here on Hacker News screamed bloody murder because they wanted native access to the hardware on iOS. So, Apple built it and the App Store. but they never got rid of the prior web based SDK and it's still there. You can build apps, install them on users phones and completely bypass the App Store.
But you ideologists just ignore that because you want to bash the App Store.
Best case you're think we'll believe you're not biased. Worst case, you're deluding yourself.
Neither choice is a good one.
- harel 11y agoI was talking about Apple this time. If we were talking about Android, I'd say the same thing. Me not seeing myself as an ideologist means that ideology is not what drives me to use Google or Apple - just pure aesthetics. I would gladly use Apple products if I found them aesthetically pleasing or technologically advanced above anything else. Same goes for any other product or way of life. In other words, I rather not let ideology dictate my life as its restricting. I prefer to deal with things on a case by case basis.