3 ms·
This is bizarre to me. Why complicate the browser with a feature that amounts to syntactic sugar? Why not keep JS simple (or better yet, simplify it further!)
by colanderman 11y ago
This is bizarre to me. Why complicate the browser with a feature that amounts to syntactic sugar?
Why not keep JS simple (or better yet, simplify it further!) so that browser implementations might finally converge, and leave the syntactic niceties to preprocessors & compilers?
- mmastrac 11y agoAs someone who writes stock JS and avoids post-processors entirely, I want stock JS to be a decent language. Sugar like this is great, though promises in the DOM APIs are a different matter.