>Clojure is an attempt at re-Flubbing Lisp. And it's a successful attempt - unless you require top tier adoption to qualify. >Where is Flub being used as a se

>Clojure is an attempt at re-Flubbing Lisp. And it's a successful attempt - unless you require top tier adoption to qualify. >Where is Flub being used as a secret weapon, in the way described by Paul Graham? Why aren't its practitioners exploiting their natural advantage? Clojure is a good candidates for Flub not only because of its power and expressivity (and as a Lisp, its natural fit as a PG-style Flub), but because it is being exploited to advantage by those who've discovered it. A small sampling includes: Adzerk, Beanstalk, CircleCI, Cognitect, Consumer Reports, Daily Mail, Database Labs, Democracy Works, Deutsche Bank, eBay, Factual, FarmLogs, Groupon, Heroku, Intuit, LivingSocial, ViaSat, MixRadio, Netflix, Nubank, OpenTable, Pivotal, Precursor, Prismatic, Puppet Labs, RoomKey, Sonian, Soundcloud, Spotify, Staples, Teradata, ThoughtWorks, Cisco, Two Sigma, Upworthy, uSwitch, World Singles, Innovation Labs, Zendesk, ... (sorry If I left out your awesome Clojure-fueled project/company but the list is too long) The Clojure experience at these companies seems to mostly fall somewhere between gushingly effusive and merely enthusiastic. Sure, there's some self-selection, and it's hard to separate developer talent from language choice in those successes, but read a few case studies and you start to get the impression that Clojure itself is not only an advantage, but a significant one. That's not to say that Clojure is the only good candidate for flub; there are other powerful, productive, and pragmatic languages that can deliver high productivity in the right context. But if I had to pick one language to be dubbed Flub, it would be Clojure.