I've seen it on MS platforms when someone packs a GPL program using Windows installers. It's assumed that if you develop for Windows, it's going to be propriet

I've seen it on MS platforms when someone packs a GPL program using Windows installers. It's assumed that if you develop for Windows, it's going to be proprietary and a restrictive license. So the packagers have a click-continue EULA boilerplate. And then the open source packager copy-pastes the GPL in the EULA screen. It's annoying, but I have seen it rarely. Thank goodness that Apt doesnt do this.