4 ms·
You're not missing much imo: http://i.imgur.com/yN0f3Sf.png http://i.imgur.com/yN0f3Sf.png
by jaytaylor 11y ago
You're not missing much imo:
http://i.imgur.com/yN0f3Sf.png http://i.imgur.com/yN0f3Sf.png
- mindhunter 11y agoyou're missing a lot if you're into web design. of course, content is king and google fucked up big times by not having a proper fallback. but that parallax scrolling is the best I've seen so far https://www.google.com/ideas/products/digital-attack-map/ https://www.google.com/ideas/products/digital-attack-map/
- barrkel 11y agoThe parallax scrolling on that page is mediocre IMO. It's unnoticeable when not using smooth scrolling (my personal default). Not a huge problem for a design feature to be unnoticeable though. When smooth-scrolling using the middle mouse button on Chrome/Linux, it doesn't update dynamically as it scrolls; the background snaps into position when scrolling stops. In Firefox/Linux, it does update dynamically with middle mouse smooth scrolling, but jerkily. It's noticeably bad in both browsers.
- conorgdaly 11y agoI visited that page in both Chrome & FF and see no use of parallax scrolling. This is a good example of parallax scrolling: http://www.firewatchgame.com/ http://www.firewatchgame.com/
- ChikkaChiChi 11y agoThe Verge's Apple Watch review will probably blow your mind, then: http://www.theverge.com/a/apple-watch-review http://www.theverge.com/a/apple-watch-review
- talles 11y agoWhat's so special about it? Seems pretty typical to me.
- toolz 11y agoI was on that site for 5 minutes and I still have no idea what it's actually trying to do. Looks like they spent so much time on all the fancy crap that makes the page load take forever that they forgot they had a message they were trying to get out. or maybe their intent was to bore me off their site because I'm not a journalist. In that case they did well!