4 ms·
Your point couldn't be that biological underpinnings are being socially reinforced because you didn't mention the biological underpinnings at all. Your 4-point
by hoopd 11y ago
Your point couldn't be that biological underpinnings are being socially reinforced because you didn't mention the biological underpinnings at all.
Your 4-point history is also off because it implies there was a gender neutral computer science that was then taken out of balance by socialization. The only thing you seem intersted in addressing is that girls aren't encouraged to tinker with things - that in and of itself is a fair point. You don't need to create a false history and a false biology to address it.
Focusing purely on socialization, while it will make you friends, will also prevent you from seeing the other reasons STEM fields are predominantly male.
- zzalpha 11y ago"Your 4-point history is also off because it implies there was a gender neutral computer science that was then taken out of balance by socialization." Which is exactly the case. During the 60s and 70s, computing programs were far more gender balanced (still biased, but nowhere near as askew as today), in part because coming out of World War 2, women were far more likely to have been in the field, for the same reason they were included in manufacturing and other previously male-dominated professions: the men were at war. The extreme male gender bias you see in computing today is a result of a regressive trend whose seeds were sown in the 80s and 90s, corresponding with the PC revolution.