3 ms·
The post struck me as an incomplete thought where the author ran out of steam. My hunch was correct when I got to his advice: 'Attempting to “solve” these p
by caminante 11y ago
The post struck me as an incomplete thought where the author ran out of steam. My hunch was correct when I got to his advice:
'Attempting to “solve” these problems means that as a
company you have to throw away everything that you know
and start from scratch.'
Feel free to go die on that hill, with HR further above in fortified gun nests.
- jjawssd 11y agoPlease explain
- caminante 11y agoQuick example: His bullet points for "What's Wrong" read like a draft outline. For example, bullet #6 says, "[The interview process is] a very uncomfortable process for the applicants" -- then he rambles giving reasons that don't really point to why there's a problem: a) he lists issues that every applicant will likely face (even in "great" interview processes b) good processes intentionally make applicants uncomfortable at times and c) lists quirks that are just part of the negotiating process and relatively unavoidable. These rough edges aside, the structure seemed incomplete. After his unfiltered stream of problems and process, he then says ~"throw away everything and start from scratch" and throws in a quote from a self-improvement, business book, as if he just did everyone a favor.